On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
> node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
>
> Aka: if some memroy of a node(which has no onlined memory) is online,
> but this new memory onlined is not normal
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
Aka: if some memroy of a node(which has no onlined memory) is online,
but this new memory onlined is not
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
> node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
As far as I can see the reasoning sounds fine and the patch looks clean.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
Aka: if some memroy of a node(which has no onlined memory) is online,
but this new memory onlined is not normal memory(HIGH memory example),
we should not allocate kmem_cache_node for
SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
Aka: if some memroy of a node(which has no onlined memory) is online,
but this new memory onlined is not normal memory(HIGH memory example),
we should not allocate kmem_cache_node for
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
SLUB only fucus on the nodes which has normal memory, so ignore the other
node's hot-adding and hot-removing.
As far as I can see the reasoning sounds fine and the patch looks clean.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
--
To unsubscribe from
6 matches
Mail list logo