Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-26 Thread Al Boldi
What happened to this one? Is it in -mm? Thanks! -- Al Al Boldi wrote: > Bodo Eggert wrote: > > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bodo Eggert wrote: > > >> This is a rework of Al Boldi's "[PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to > > >> use tmpfs instead of ramfs". All the fame belongs to

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-26 Thread Al Boldi
What happened to this one? Is it in -mm? Thanks! -- Al Al Boldi wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: This is a rework of Al Boldi's [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs. All the fame belongs to him, the bugs

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-14 Thread Al Boldi
Bodo Eggert wrote: > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bodo Eggert wrote: > > Please reply-to-all, I'm not subscribed, but reading through a news > gateway. Same here. The problem is, I have no idea who's on the cc, and expected you to be on the list. Sorry. > >> This is a rework of Al

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-14 Thread Bodo Eggert
Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bodo Eggert wrote: Please reply-to-all, I'm not subscribed, but reading through a news gateway. >> This is a rework of Al Boldi's "[PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use >> tmpfs instead of ramfs". All the fame belongs to him, the bugs belong to >> me. > >

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-14 Thread Bodo Eggert
Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: Please reply-to-all, I'm not subscribed, but reading through a news gateway. This is a rework of Al Boldi's [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs. All the fame belongs to him, the bugs belong to me. Actually, my

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-14 Thread Al Boldi
Bodo Eggert wrote: Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: Please reply-to-all, I'm not subscribed, but reading through a news gateway. Same here. The problem is, I have no idea who's on the cc, and expected you to be on the list. Sorry. This is a rework of Al Boldi's

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-13 Thread Al Boldi
Bodo Eggert wrote: > Change the root filesystem to tmpfs. Doing this makes having a system on > tmpfs much easier, while allowing to discard the now unnecessary ramfs. Thanks a lot! > Having the rootfs on tmpfs allows to safely run e.g. a rescue system > without using tricks. You might even

[PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-13 Thread Bodo Eggert
Change the root filesystem to tmpfs. Doing this makes having a system on tmpfs much easier, while allowing to discard the now unnecessary ramfs. Having the rootfs on tmpfs allows to safely run e.g. a rescue system without using tricks. You might even include the rescue system into the kernel.

[PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-13 Thread Bodo Eggert
Change the root filesystem to tmpfs. Doing this makes having a system on tmpfs much easier, while allowing to discard the now unnecessary ramfs. Having the rootfs on tmpfs allows to safely run e.g. a rescue system without using tricks. You might even include the rescue system into the kernel.

Re: [PATCH 2/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs: root-on-tmpfs

2007-07-13 Thread Al Boldi
Bodo Eggert wrote: Change the root filesystem to tmpfs. Doing this makes having a system on tmpfs much easier, while allowing to discard the now unnecessary ramfs. Thanks a lot! Having the rootfs on tmpfs allows to safely run e.g. a rescue system without using tricks. You might even include