On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 9:23 AM Alex Ghiti wrote:
>
> Yes I considered it...when you re-proposed it :) I'm not opposed to your
> solution in the vmalloc region but I can't find any advantage over the
> current solution, are there ? That would harmonize with Linus's work,
> but then we'd be quite
Hi Arnd,
Le 3/11/21 à 3:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:12 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
Le 3/10/21 à 6:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
Le 2/25/21 à 5:34 AM, David Hildenbrand a écrit :
||
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:12 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
> Le 3/10/21 à 6:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 2/25/21 à 5:34 AM, David Hildenbrand a écrit :
> >>>|| | |> +
> >>>
Hi Arnd,
Le 3/10/21 à 6:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
Le 2/25/21 à 5:34 AM, David Hildenbrand a écrit :
|| | |> +
ffc0 | -256GB | ffc7 | 32 GB | kasan
+
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:56 PM Alex Ghiti wrote:
>
> Le 2/25/21 à 5:34 AM, David Hildenbrand a écrit :
> > || | |> +
> > ffc0 | -256GB | ffc7 | 32 GB | kasan
> >> + ffcefee0 | -196GB |
Le 2/25/21 à 5:34 AM, David Hildenbrand a écrit :
| | | |> +
ffc0 | -256 GB | ffc7 | 32 GB | kasan
+ ffcefee0 | -196 GB | ffcefeff | 2 MB | fixmap
+ ffceff00 | -196 GB |
|| | |> +
ffc0 | -256GB | ffc7 | 32 GB | kasan
+ ffcefee0 | -196GB | ffcefeff |2 MB | fixmap
+ ffceff00 | -196GB | ffce | 16 MB | PCI io
+ ffcf
This new document presents the RISC-V virtual memory layout and is based
one the x86 one: it describes the different limits of the different regions
of the virtual address space.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti
---
Documentation/riscv/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/riscv/vm-layout.rst | 61
8 matches
Mail list logo
