On 23/09/19 17:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> This patch reports NoNonArchitecturalCoreSharing bit in to userspace in the
>> first case. The second case is outside of KVM's domain of responsibility
>> (as vCPU pinning is actually done by someone who manages KVM's userspace -
>> e.g. libvirt pinning
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hyper-V 2019 doesn't expose MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests when it cannot
> guarantee that two virtual processors won't end up running on sibling SMT
> threads without knowing about it. This is done as an optimization as in
> this
On 17/09/19 11:33, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Jim Mattson writes:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:23 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hyper-V 2019 doesn't expose MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests when it cannot
>>> guarantee that two virtual processors won't end up running on sibling SMT
>>> threads
Jim Mattson writes:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:23 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> Hyper-V 2019 doesn't expose MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests when it cannot
>> guarantee that two virtual processors won't end up running on sibling SMT
>> threads without knowing about it. This is done as an
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:23 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> Hyper-V 2019 doesn't expose MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests when it cannot
> guarantee that two virtual processors won't end up running on sibling SMT
> threads without knowing about it. This is done as an optimization as in
> this case
Hyper-V 2019 doesn't expose MD_CLEAR CPUID bit to guests when it cannot
guarantee that two virtual processors won't end up running on sibling SMT
threads without knowing about it. This is done as an optimization as in
this case there is nothing the guest can do to protect itself against MDS
and
6 matches
Mail list logo
