On 09/22/2015 06:19 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:00:28PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015
On 09/22/2015 06:19 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:00:28PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 16:39:31 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> > > On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> > On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> > >> From: David Daney
> > >>
> > >> The on-chip devices all
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:00:28PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> >>On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
>
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 16:39:31 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> > > On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney
Hi David,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:00:28PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> >>On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> > On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> > >> From: David Daney
> > >>
> > >>
On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> >> From: David Daney
> >>
> >> The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Daney
>
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
You should be able to just mark the BARs as fixed in DT
In the case of ACPI,
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
>
You should be able to just mark the BARs as fixed in DT and not need
this hack. If that doesn't work with current
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> >> From: David Daney
> >>
> >> The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
> >>
> >>
On 09/18/2015 12:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2015 10:00:32 David Daney wrote:
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So,
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
>
You should be able to just mark the BARs as fixed in DT and not need
On 09/18/2015 12:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:41:33 David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
You should be able to just mark
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
---
drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 6 +++
drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pci/host/quirks-thunder.c | 95 +++
3 files changed,
From: David Daney
The on-chip devices all have fixed bars. So, fix them up.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
---
drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 6 +++
drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pci/host/quirks-thunder.c | 95
18 matches
Mail list logo