* Stephen Boyd [240228 22:59]:
> +Tony
>
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-24 01:12:35)
> > Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable
> > between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add
> > support for gate clock"). It was enough of time
+Tony
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-24 01:12:35)
> Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable
> between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add
> support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable
> and expect usual
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:12:35 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable
> between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add
> support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable
> and expect
Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable
between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add
support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable
and expect usual ABI rules.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
