M
> To: t...@linutronix.de
> Cc: mi...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] genirq: Do not consider the irqs with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> in check_wakeup_irqs()
>
>
> According to commit 9c6079aa1bf(genirq: Do not consider disabled
> wakeup irqs)
According to commit 9c6079aa1bf(genirq: Do not consider disabled
wakeup irqs), we should not break the suspend when one interrupt has
been disabled before suspending and is pending there.
But there is another case missed:
If an interrupt which is marked IRQF_NO_SUSPEND has been disabled
before su
2 matches
Mail list logo
