On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> It is currently not obvious that the RECLAIM_* bits are part of the
> uapi since they are defined in vmscan.c. Move them to a uapi header
> to make it obvious.
>
> This should have no functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave
On 7/1/20 8:46 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * These bit locations are exposed in the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl
>> + * ABI. New bits are OK, but existing bits can never change.
>> + */
>> +#define RECLAIM_ZONE (1<<0)/* Run shrink_inactive_list on the zone
>> */
>> +#define
On 20-07-01 08:26:24, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> It is currently not obvious that the RECLAIM_* bits are part of the
> uapi since they are defined in vmscan.c. Move them to a uapi header
> to make it obvious.
>
> This should have no functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by:
From: Dave Hansen
It is currently not obvious that the RECLAIM_* bits are part of the
uapi since they are defined in vmscan.c. Move them to a uapi header
to make it obvious.
This should have no functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
Cc: Ben Widawsky
Cc: Alex Shi
Cc: Daniel Wagner
4 matches
Mail list logo