On Fri, 8 Apr 2016, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:34 PM, wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Martin Brandenburg
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> From: Martin Brandenburg
> >> >>
> >> >> Almost everywhere we
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:34 PM, wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Martin Brandenburg
>> > wrote:
>> >> From: Martin Brandenburg
>> >>
>> >> Almost everywhere we use strncpy we should use strlcpy. This affects
>> >> path n
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Martin Brandenburg
> > wrote:
> >> From: Martin Brandenburg
> >>
> >> Almost everywhere we use strncpy we should use strlcpy. This affects
> >> path names (d_name mostly), symlink targets, and server
It looks like strscpy went in last October... there are
no users of it yet. I was just about to send in a pull request
that includes Martin's strncpy->strlcpy patch when I saw
Andy's comment.
Linus said when he pulled strscpy:
> So I'm pulling the strscpy() support because it *is* a better interf
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> From: Martin Brandenburg
>
> Almost everywhere we use strncpy we should use strlcpy. This affects
> path names (d_name mostly), symlink targets, and server names.
>
> Leave debugfs code as is for now, though it could use a review as wel
From: Martin Brandenburg
Almost everywhere we use strncpy we should use strlcpy. This affects
path names (d_name mostly), symlink targets, and server names.
Leave debugfs code as is for now, though it could use a review as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Brandenburg
---
fs/orangefs/dcache.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
