The Amazon's Annapurna Labs SoCs includes Point Of Serialization error
logging unit that reports an error in case write error (e.g. attempt to
write to a read only register).
This patch introduces the support for this unit.
Signed-off-by: Talel Shenhar
---
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:14 AM Talel Shenhar wrote:
>
> The Amazon's Annapurna Labs SoCs includes Point Of Serialization error
> logging unit that reports an error in case write error (e.g. attempt to
> write to a read only register).
> This patch introduces the support for this unit.
>
> Signed-
On 9/9/2019 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:14 AM Talel Shenhar wrote:
The Amazon's Annapurna Labs SoCs includes Point Of Serialization error
logging unit that reports an error in case write error (e.g. attempt to
write to a read only register).
This patch introduces
Hi Talel,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc8 next-20190904]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tale
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:13 PM Shenhar, Talel wrote:
> On 9/9/2019 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:14 AM Talel Shenhar wrote:
> >> + writel_relaxed(0, pos->mmio_base + AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1);
> > Why do you require _relaxed() accessors here? Please add a comment
>
On 9/9/2019 4:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:13 PM Shenhar, Talel wrote:
On 9/9/2019 12:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:14 AM Talel Shenhar wrote:
+ writel_relaxed(0, pos->mmio_base + AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1);
Why do you require _relaxed() acce
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM Shenhar, Talel wrote:
> On 9/9/2019 4:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> In current implementation of v1, I am not doing any read barrier, Hence,
> using the non-relaxed will add unneeded memory barrier.
>
> I have no strong objection moving to the non-relaxed version a
On 9/9/2019 6:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:11 PM Shenhar, Talel wrote:
On 9/9/2019 4:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
In current implementation of v1, I am not doing any read barrier, Hence,
using the non-relaxed will add unneeded memory barrier.
I have no strong objectio
8 matches
Mail list logo