On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:09:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > @@ -3511,7 +3506,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct
> > shrinker *shrink,
> > list_splice_tail(, >split_queue);
> >
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:09:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> @@ -3511,7 +3506,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct
> shrinker *shrink,
> list_splice_tail(, >split_queue);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(>split_queue_lock, flags);
>
> - return split *
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:09:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > @@ -3511,7 +3506,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct
> > shrinker *shrink,
> > list_splice_tail(, >split_queue);
> >
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:09:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> @@ -3511,7 +3506,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct
> shrinker *shrink,
> list_splice_tail(, >split_queue);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(>split_queue_lock, flags);
>
> - return split *
I've got meaning of shrinker::count_objects() wrong: it should return
number of potentially freeable objects, which is not necessary correlate
with freeable memory.
Returning 256 per THP in queue is not reasonable:
shrinker::scan_objects() never called with nr_to_scan > 128 in my setup.
Let's
I've got meaning of shrinker::count_objects() wrong: it should return
number of potentially freeable objects, which is not necessary correlate
with freeable memory.
Returning 256 per THP in queue is not reasonable:
shrinker::scan_objects() never called with nr_to_scan > 128 in my setup.
Let's
6 matches
Mail list logo