On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 7:42 AM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/26/20 8:28 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:01 PM Stanimir Varbanov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/25/20 5:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:12 AM Stanimir Varbano
On 11/26/20 8:28 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:01 PM Stanimir Varbanov
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/25/20 5:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:12 AM Stanimir Varbanov
>>> wrote:
Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:01 PM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/25/20 5:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:12 AM Stanimir Varbanov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
> >> supported number of sessions. But
On 11/25/20 5:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:12 AM Stanimir Varbanov
> wrote:
>>
>> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
>> supported number of sessions. But this errors are happened at reqbuf
>> time which is a bit later. The more
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:12 AM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
> supported number of sessions. But this errors are happened at reqbuf
> time which is a bit later. The more reasonable way looks like is to
> return the error on dr
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 6:48 AM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/21/20 3:14 AM, Fritz Koenig wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stanimir Varbanov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
> >> supported number of sessions. But this
On 11/21/20 3:14 AM, Fritz Koenig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stanimir Varbanov
> wrote:
>>
>> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
>> supported number of sessions. But this errors are happened at reqbuf
>> time which is a bit later. The more reas
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
> Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
> supported number of sessions. But this errors are happened at reqbuf
> time which is a bit later. The more reasonable way looks like is to
> return the error on dr
Currently we rely on firmware to return error when we reach the maximum
supported number of sessions. But this errors are happened at reqbuf
time which is a bit later. The more reasonable way looks like is to
return the error on driver open.
To achieve that modify hfi_session_create to return erro
9 matches
Mail list logo