Hello,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:26:35AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > It's a bit difficult to get excited about this patchset given that
> > this is mostly churn without many actual benefits. Sure, it
> > consolidates one-per-pool managers into one kthread_worker but it was
> > one-per-pool a
On 07/29/2014 02:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Lai.
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:04:50AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> There are some problems with the managers:
>> 1) The last idle worker prefer managing to processing.
>> It is better that the processing of work items should be the f
Hello, Lai.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:04:50AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> There are some problems with the managers:
> 1) The last idle worker prefer managing to processing.
> It is better that the processing of work items should be the first
> priority to make the whole system make
There are some problems with the managers:
1) The last idle worker prefer managing to processing.
It is better that the processing of work items should be the first
priority to make the whole system make progress earlier.
2) managers among different pools can be parallel, but actually
4 matches
Mail list logo
