On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:06:11PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Okay, so I'll redo Patch 3 in this set and drop this one. Any comments on
> Patch 1?
Nope, I took it already.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:06:11PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Okay, so I'll redo Patch 3 in this set and drop this one. Any comments on
> Patch 1?
Nope, I took it already.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:57 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; Tony Luck ;
> x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:57 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; Tony Luck ;
> x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce/AMD: Define a list_head for
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:39:03PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Like I said in the commit message, the list_head needs to be outside the
> list to access all the elements using list_for_each*. Otherwise, we won't
> get a reference to the "head" element since we iterate starting from
> head->next
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:39:03PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Like I said in the commit message, the list_head needs to be outside the
> list to access all the elements using list_for_each*. Otherwise, we won't
> get a reference to the "head" element since we iterate starting from
> head->next
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 1:22 PM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov ; Tony Luck
> ; x...@kernel.org;
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 1:22 PM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov ; Tony Luck
> ; x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce/AMD: Define a
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:41:46PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> There needs to be a list_head outside of a linked list in order to iterate
> over it and have access to all its elements. This is because the
> list_for_each* macros iterate starting
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:41:46PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> There needs to be a list_head outside of a linked list in order to iterate
> over it and have access to all its elements. This is because the
> list_for_each* macros iterate starting from head->next rather
From: Yazen Ghannam
There needs to be a list_head outside of a linked list in order to iterate
over it and have access to all its elements. This is because the
list_for_each* macros iterate starting from head->next rather than head.
Define a list_head for the threshold
From: Yazen Ghannam
There needs to be a list_head outside of a linked list in order to iterate
over it and have access to all its elements. This is because the
list_for_each* macros iterate starting from head->next rather than head.
Define a list_head for the threshold blocks list in struct
12 matches
Mail list logo