On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 08:28:18AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > This seems fine but doesn't apply against current code but otherwise
> > seems fine.
> My base is 3.11-rc2.
Always submit against where the code will be applied - -next in this
case.
signature.asc
Des
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:10:59 +0100
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > The function kirkwood_i2s_dev_remove() may be used when probe fails.
>
> This seems fine but doesn't apply against current code but otherwise
> seems fine.
My base is
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> The function kirkwood_i2s_dev_remove() may be used when probe fails.
This seems fine but doesn't apply against current code but otherwise
seems fine.
> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->extclk)) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(p
The function kirkwood_i2s_dev_remove() may be used when probe fails.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
---
sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c | 44 +++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c
b/sound/s
4 matches
Mail list logo
