From: Laure Millet <laure.mil...@lip6.fr>

This patch fixes a coding style error in a pointer declaration.

Signed-off-by: Laure Millet <laure.mil...@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Lorrillere <maxime.lorrill...@lip6.fr>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index 992f3f0..477dae1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ out:
  * Instead, ll_ddelete() and ll_d_iput() will update it based upon if there
  * is any lock existing. They will recycle dentries and inodes based upon locks
  * too. b=20433 */
-static int ll_unlink(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *dentry)
+static int ll_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 {
        struct ptlrpc_request *request = NULL;
        struct md_op_data *op_data;
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to