Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-02-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kumar Gala writes: > On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Kumar Gala writes: >> >>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board >>> support that will not transition over to multipla

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-02-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Kumar Gala writes: > >> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board >> support that will not transition over to multiplatform. >> >> As part of thi

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-02-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kumar Gala writes: > Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be > multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board > support that will not transition over to multiplatform. > > As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over > to

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be > multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board > support that will not transition over to multiplatform. > > As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 31 January 2014 13:25:25 Kumar Gala wrote: >>> The hotplug.c change sticks out as something that isn't just a move >>> of code to another place, but deletion of unused code. It would >>> be nice to split that out into a separate chang

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 31 January 2014 13:25:25 Kumar Gala wrote: > > The hotplug.c change sticks out as something that isn't just a move > > of code to another place, but deletion of unused code. It would > > be nice to split that out into a separate change, possibly together > > with the trivial board.c and s

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2014, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board >> support that will not transition over to multiplatfo

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 30 January 2014, Kumar Gala wrote: > Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be > multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board > support that will not transition over to multiplatform. > > As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM

Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-31 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:36:40PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be > multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board > support that will not transition over to multiplatform. > > As part of this, we move support for

[PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform

2014-01-30 Thread Kumar Gala
Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board support that will not transition over to multiplatform. As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over to mach-qcom. Signed-off-by: Kumar