On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:27:02AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> is highly debatable). I also seem to remember that there might also be
> cases where DT values cannot be changed at all for a (new?) platform
> that happens to be using DTs shipped with an old revision; something
> along these lines was
Hi Juri,
On 26/11/2018 09:27, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/11/18 17:54, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 23/11/2018 17:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 23/11/2018 14:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM
Hi,
On 23/11/18 17:54, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 23/11/2018 17:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2018 14:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The mutex protects
On 23/11/2018 17:20, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 23/11/2018 14:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
h
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 05:04:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 23/11/2018 14:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
> >> happen only when the cpufreq governor module
On 23/11/2018 14:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
>> happen only when the cpufreq governor module is loaded and at the same
>> time the cpu capacity is changed in the sys
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:23:18PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
> happen only when the cpufreq governor module is loaded and at the same
> time the cpu capacity is changed in the sysfs.
>
I wonder if we really need that sysfs e
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:54 PM Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
>
> The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
> happen only when the cpufreq governor module is loaded and at the same
> time the cpu capacity is changed in the sysfs.
>
> There is no real interest of using a mutex to
The mutex protects a per_cpu variable access. The potential race can
happen only when the cpufreq governor module is loaded and at the same
time the cpu capacity is changed in the sysfs.
There is no real interest of using a mutex to protect a variable
assignation when there is no situation where a
9 matches
Mail list logo
