Re: [PATCH 2/4] befs: add check for ag_shift in superblock

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > ag_shift and blocks_per_ag contain the same information in different ways, > same as block_shift and block_size do. It is worth checking this two are > consistent, but since blocks_per_ag isn't documented as mandatory to use >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] befs: add check for ag_shift in superblock

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > ag_shift and blocks_per_ag contain the same information in different ways, > same as block_shift and block_size do. It is worth checking this two are > consistent, but since blocks_per_ag isn't documented as mandatory to use >

[PATCH 2/4] befs: add check for ag_shift in superblock

ag_shift and blocks_per_ag contain the same information in different ways, same as block_shift and block_size do. It is worth checking this two are consistent, but since blocks_per_ag isn't documented as mandatory to use some implementations of befs don't enforce this, so making it non-fatal if

[PATCH 2/4] befs: add check for ag_shift in superblock

ag_shift and blocks_per_ag contain the same information in different ways, same as block_shift and block_size do. It is worth checking this two are consistent, but since blocks_per_ag isn't documented as mandatory to use some implementations of befs don't enforce this, so making it non-fatal if