Either CPUs are hot-unplugged or suspend/resume occurs, cpufreq core will send
notifications to cpufreq-stats and stats structure and sysfs entries would be
correctly handled..

And so we don't actually need hotcpu notifiers in cpufreq-stats anymore. We were
only handling cpu hot-unplug events here and that are already taken care of by
POLICY notifiers.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 38 ++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 0f71562..8fa5844 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -294,11 +294,8 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy(struct 
notifier_block *nb,
        if (val == CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY)
                ret = cpufreq_stats_create_table(policy, table);
        else if (val == CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY) {
-               /* This might already be freed by cpu hotplug notifier */
-               if (per_cpu(cpufreq_stats_table, cpu)) {
-                       cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(cpu);
-                       cpufreq_stats_free_table(cpu);
-               }
+               cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(cpu);
+               cpufreq_stats_free_table(cpu);
        }
 
        return ret;
@@ -340,33 +337,6 @@ static int cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans(struct 
notifier_block *nb,
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int cpufreq_stat_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
-                                              unsigned long action,
-                                              void *hcpu)
-{
-       unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
-
-       /* Don't free/allocate stats during suspend/resume */
-       if (action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)
-               return 0;
-
-       switch (action) {
-       case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-               cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(cpu);
-               break;
-       case CPU_DEAD:
-               cpufreq_stats_free_table(cpu);
-               break;
-       }
-       return NOTIFY_OK;
-}
-
-/* priority=1 so this will get called before cpufreq_remove_dev */
-static struct notifier_block cpufreq_stat_cpu_notifier __refdata = {
-       .notifier_call = cpufreq_stat_cpu_callback,
-       .priority = 1,
-};
-
 static struct notifier_block notifier_policy_block = {
        .notifier_call = cpufreq_stat_notifier_policy
 };
@@ -386,14 +356,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_stats_init(void)
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-       register_hotcpu_notifier(&cpufreq_stat_cpu_notifier);
-
        ret = cpufreq_register_notifier(&notifier_trans_block,
                                CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
        if (ret) {
                cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&notifier_policy_block,
                                CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
-               unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpufreq_stat_cpu_notifier);
                for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
                        cpufreq_stats_free_table(cpu);
                return ret;
@@ -409,7 +376,6 @@ static void __exit cpufreq_stats_exit(void)
                        CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
        cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&notifier_trans_block,
                        CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
-       unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpufreq_stat_cpu_notifier);
        for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
                cpufreq_stats_free_table(cpu);
                cpufreq_stats_free_sysfs(cpu);
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to