Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

2018-03-02 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin : > The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable > so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

2018-01-29 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable > so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + > 1 file chan

Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

2018-01-16 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin : > The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable > so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >

[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

2018-01-16 Thread Peter Rosin
The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/