2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin :
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
> 1 file chan
2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin :
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/
4 matches
Mail list logo