On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:48:18AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:58PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU
> >
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:30:12AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 ,
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:30:12AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:48:18AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:58PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU
card with
the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:58PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU card
> > with
> > the eeprom is manufactured separately from its carier cards.
>
>
Hi Guenter,
On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
> I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU card
> with
> the eeprom is manufactured separately from its carier cards.
I think your use case may be more compelling than two flavors of Beaglebone
(one of
Hi Rob,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 19:30 , Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>
Hi Peter,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 18:34 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2015 10:38 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 ,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>> Hi Frank,
> >>>
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand
On 02/20/2015 10:38 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>>
>> On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
Hi Peter,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter
On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>>
>> On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>>
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
Hi Peter,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
Hi Peter,
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 16:21 , Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>> Hi Frank,
> >>>
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi
On 02/19/2015 09:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>>>
>>> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
> >>
> >> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>> Hi Mark,
> >>>
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 ,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot
On 02/19/2015 09:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 16:21 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015
On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00
On 02/20/2015 10:38 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:00 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 09:35 AM,
Hi Rob,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 19:30 , Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ludovic Desroches
ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:38 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Feb 19,
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 18:34 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 10:38 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb 20, 2015, at 17:24 , Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/20/2015 10:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Feb
Hi Guenter,
On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU card
with
the eeprom is manufactured separately from its carier cards.
I think your use case may be more compelling than two flavors of Beaglebone
(one of
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:58PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 02/20/2015 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
I am open to hearing your suggestions for our use case, where the CPU card
with
the eeprom is manufactured separately from its carier cards.
I think your
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:12 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Or use a 1-wire or I2C EEPROM to store your board information.
no, you don't reduce the human error probability.
eeprom needs to be preprogrammed, factory will at some point have a lot
of eeprom with different version, and will
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
> >>
> >> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:01:59PM +0100, Maxime Bizon wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:38 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
> > Having to boot and tweak the bootloader settings to select the correct
> > dtb (even if it’s present on the flash medium) takes time and is
> > error-prone.
>
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:38 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Having to boot and tweak the bootloader settings to select the correct
> dtb (even if it’s present on the flash medium) takes time and is
> error-prone.
Dedicate a set of GPIO for board/PCB revision detection (it only costs a
few
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>>
>> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
>> a target in the base DT resulting in a modification
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> +While this may in theory work, in practice it
Hi Frank,
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>> +While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
>> +for the following reasons:
On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
> +While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
> +for the following reasons:
> +
> +1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob
On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>>>
>>> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be
Hi Frank,
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>>
>> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
>> a target in the base DT resulting in a
Hi Mark,
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the following reasons:
+
+1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
+a reasonably advanced bootloader with some
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the following reasons:
+
+1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
+a reasonably advanced bootloader with some
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01:14PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:38 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Having to boot and tweak the bootloader settings to select the correct
dtb (even if it’s present on the flash medium) takes time and is
error-prone.
Dedicate a set of GPIO for board/PCB revision detection (it only costs a
few
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:12 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Or use a 1-wire or I2C EEPROM to store your board information.
no, you don't reduce the human error probability.
eeprom needs to be preprogrammed, factory will at some point have a lot
of eeprom with different version, and will
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:01:59PM +0100, Maxime Bizon wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 19:38 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Having to boot and tweak the bootloader settings to select the correct
dtb (even if it’s present on the flash medium) takes time and is
error-prone.
On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
+While this may in theory work, in
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT
On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the following reasons:
+
+1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the
On Feb 19, 2015, at 19:30 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Frank,
On Feb 19, 2015, at 18:48 , Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 19:31 ,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Frank Rowand frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT resulting in a
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>
> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
> a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
> tree. The format of the quirk nodes is that
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:31:16PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >> +While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
> > >> +for the following reasons:
> > >> +
> > >> +1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
> > >> +a reasonably advanced bootloader
> >> +While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
> >> +for the following reasons:
> >> +
> >> +1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
> >> +a reasonably advanced bootloader with some kind of configuration or
> >> +scripting capabilities. Sadly this
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pantelis,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:39:01PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> > On Feb 18, 2015, at 18:32 , Ludovic Desroches
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Great something we are waiting for a long time!
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>
Hi Ludovic,
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 18:32 , Ludovic Desroches
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Great something we are waiting for a long time!
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Pantelis,
Hi,
Great something we are waiting for a long time!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pantelis,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>
Hi Mark,
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>>
>> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
>> a
Hi Pantelis,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
>
> A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
> a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
> tree. The
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
tree. The format of the quirk nodes is that of a device tree overlay.
For details please refer to
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the following reasons:
+
+1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
+a reasonably advanced bootloader with some kind of configuration or
+scripting capabilities. Sadly this is not the case
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:31:16PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
+While this may in theory work, in practice it is very cumbersome
+for the following reasons:
+
+1. The act of selecting a different boot device tree blob requires
+a reasonably advanced bootloader with some kind of
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied
Hi Pantelis,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
tree. The format
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
tree. The format of the quirk nodes is that of a device tree overlay.
For details please refer to
Hi,
Great something we are waiting for a long time!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 18:32 , Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com
wrote:
Hi,
Great something we are waiting for a long time!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:39:01PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 18:32 , Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com
wrote:
Hi,
Great something we are waiting for a long time!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2015, at 17:41 , Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:59:34PM +, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the
On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.
A DT quirk is a subtree of the boot DT that can be applied to
a target in the base DT resulting in a modification of the live
tree. The format of the quirk nodes is that of a
84 matches
Mail list logo
