Hi Andrew, Jean:
* Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 22:18:29 +0100]:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Andrew, both patches are
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > We
Hi Andrew, Jean:
* Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-11 22:18:29 +0100]:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote:
Andrew, both patches are
Acked-by: Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We already have
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Andrew, both patches are
> >
> > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We already have Signed-off-by:you, which I figure outranks acked-by: ;)
Yeah but that wasn't the
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote:
Andrew, both patches are
Acked-by: Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We already have Signed-off-by:you, which I figure outranks acked-by: ;)
Yeah but that wasn't the same me.
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
> >
> > Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
> > invoking this shortly
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
invoking this shortly before they
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
> >
> > Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
> > invoking this shortly before they
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
invoking this shortly before they call
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
>
> Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
> invoking this shortly before they call request_region.
> If -EBUSY is returned, the driver must not
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
invoking this shortly before they call request_region.
If -EBUSY is returned, the driver must not load.
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
invoking this shortly before they call request_region.
If -EBUSY is returned, the driver must not load.
Use acpi_enforce_resources=strict/lax/no options to:
- strict: let conflicting
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also
invoking this shortly before they call request_region.
If -EBUSY is returned, the driver must not load.
Use acpi_enforce_resources=strict/lax/no options to:
- strict: let conflicting
13 matches
Mail list logo
