On 27 August 2015 at 09:33, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 11:12 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> On 26 August 2015 at 11:57, Christopher Covington
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2015 04:41 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
'ctxid_val' array was used to store the value of ETM context ID comparato
On 08/27/2015 11:12 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 11:57, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> On 07/07/2015 04:41 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>>> 'ctxid_val' array was used to store the value of ETM context ID comparator
>>> which actually stores the process ID to be traced, so using '
On 26 August 2015 at 11:57, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 04:41 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> 'ctxid_val' array was used to store the value of ETM context ID comparator
>> which actually stores the process ID to be traced, so using 'ctxid_pid' as
>> its name instead make it easier to
On 07/07/2015 04:41 AM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> 'ctxid_val' array was used to store the value of ETM context ID comparator
> which actually stores the process ID to be traced, so using 'ctxid_pid' as
> its name instead make it easier to understand.
Previous discussion with some ARM folks has led me
'ctxid_val' array was used to store the value of ETM context ID comparator
which actually stores the process ID to be traced, so using 'ctxid_pid' as
its name instead make it easier to understand.
This patch also changes the ABI, it is normally not allowed, but
fortunately it is a testing ABI and
5 matches
Mail list logo
