Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Kent Overstreet
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:10:18PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:30:30PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when > > we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in > >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:30:30PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when > we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in > generic_make_request() (or bio_add_page() originally) Given that Jens has

[PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Kent Overstreet
We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in generic_make_request() (or bio_add_page() originally) Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Asai Thambi S P Cc: Sam Bradshaw ---

[PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Kent Overstreet
We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in generic_make_request() (or bio_add_page() originally) Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet k...@daterainc.com Cc: Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk Cc: Asai

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:30:30PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in generic_make_request() (or bio_add_page() originally) Given that Jens has a

Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtip32xx: handle arbitrary size bios

2013-11-25 Thread Kent Overstreet
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:10:18PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:30:30PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: We get a measurable performance increase by handling this in the driver when we're already looping over the biovec, instead of handling it separately in