[PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-07-05 Thread Tony Lindgren
We must return the selector from pinmux_generic_add_function() so pin controller device drivers can remove the right group if needed for deferred probe for example. And we now must make sure that a proper name is passed so we can use it to check if the entry already exists. Note that fixes are als

[PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-06-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
We must return the selector from pinmux_generic_add_function() so pin controller device drivers can remove the right group if needed for deferred probe for example. And we now must make sure that a proper name is passed so we can use it to check if the entry already exists. Note that fixes are als

Re: [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-06-17 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > We must return the selector from pinmux_generic_add_function() so > pin controller device drivers can remove the right group if needed > for deferred probe for example. > > Note that fixes are also needed for the pin controller drivers to >

[PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-06-15 Thread Tony Lindgren
We must return the selector from pinmux_generic_add_function() so pin controller device drivers can remove the right group if needed for deferred probe for example. Note that fixes are also needed for the pin controller drivers to use the selector value. Fixes: a76edc89b100 ("pinctrl: core: Add g