On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:02:04AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 1) "NUMA code" = system's NUMA memory hotplug code, AKA, keep the numa
> mapping stable
>
>I think this is the better idea. This idea came to my mind immediately at
> the time
>I received the bug report. And after some
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:02:04AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
1) NUMA code = system's NUMA memory hotplug code, AKA, keep the numa
mapping stable
I think this is the better idea. This idea came to my mind immediately at
the time
I received the bug report. And after some
On 12/12/2014 06:19 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a allocation failure bug when the numa mapping
> between CPU and node is changed. This was the last scene:
> SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node 2 (gfp=0x80d0)
> cache: kmalloc-192, object size: 192, buffer size: 192,
On 12/12/2014 06:19 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a allocation failure bug when the numa mapping
between CPU and node is changed. This was the last scene:
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node 2 (gfp=0x80d0)
cache: kmalloc-192, object size: 192, buffer size: 192, default
On 12/13/2014 01:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:19:52PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> ...
>> +static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
>> +{
>> +int node, orig_node = NUMA_NO_NODE, new_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> +
>> +lockdep_assert_held(_pool_mutex);
>> +
>> +
On 12/13/2014 01:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:19:52PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
...
+static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
+{
+int node, orig_node = NUMA_NO_NODE, new_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+
+lockdep_assert_held(wq_pool_mutex);
+
+if
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:19:52PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
...
> +static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
> +{
> + int node, orig_node = NUMA_NO_NODE, new_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(_pool_mutex);
> +
> + if (!wq_numa_enabled)
> + return;
>
Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a allocation failure bug when the numa mapping
between CPU and node is changed. This was the last scene:
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node 2 (gfp=0x80d0)
cache: kmalloc-192, object size: 192, buffer size: 192, default order: 1, min
order: 0
node 0: slabs: 6172,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a allocation failure bug when the numa mapping
between CPU and node is changed. This was the last scene:
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node 2 (gfp=0x80d0)
cache: kmalloc-192, object size: 192, buffer size: 192, default order: 1, min
order: 0
node 0: slabs: 6172,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:19:52PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
...
+static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
+{
+ int node, orig_node = NUMA_NO_NODE, new_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(wq_pool_mutex);
+
+ if (!wq_numa_enabled)
+ return;
+
+
10 matches
Mail list logo