On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 08:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
>>
>> Thanks. I've added your Reviewed-by to the 1/5 patch as well - to be able to
>> put
>> the whole series into the tip:x86/en
On 11/12/2015 08:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/12/2015 00:12, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> From: Andy Lutomirski
>>>
>>> The pvclock vdso code was too abstracted to understand easily and
>>> excessively paranoid. Simplify it for a huge speedup.
>>>
>>> This
* Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/2015 00:12, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > From: Andy Lutomirski
> >
> > The pvclock vdso code was too abstracted to understand easily and
> > excessively paranoid. Simplify it for a huge speedup.
> >
> > This opens the door for additional simplifications,
On 10/12/2015 00:12, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski
>
> The pvclock vdso code was too abstracted to understand easily and
> excessively paranoid. Simplify it for a huge speedup.
>
> This opens the door for additional simplifications, as the vdso no
> longer accesses the pvti f
From: Andy Lutomirski
The pvclock vdso code was too abstracted to understand easily and
excessively paranoid. Simplify it for a huge speedup.
This opens the door for additional simplifications, as the vdso no
longer accesses the pvti for any vcpu other than vcpu 0.
Before, vclock_gettime using
5 matches
Mail list logo
