Hi Sergey,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:17:06AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (04/03/17 14:17), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > +static bool zram_special_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
> > + struct page *page,
> > + unsigned int
Hello,
On (04/03/17 14:17), Minchan Kim wrote:
> +static bool zram_special_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
> + struct page *page,
> + unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
> +{
> + struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
> +
> +
On 04/03/2017 09:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:52:33AM +0300, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 04/03/2017 08:17 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> For architecture(PAGE_SIZE > 4K), zram have supported partial IO.
>>> However, the mixed code for handling normal/
Hi Mika,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:52:33AM +0300, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 04/03/2017 08:17 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > For architecture(PAGE_SIZE > 4K), zram have supported partial IO.
> > However, the mixed code for handling normal/partial IO is too mess,
> > error-prone to modify I
Hi!
On 04/03/2017 08:17 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> For architecture(PAGE_SIZE > 4K), zram have supported partial IO.
> However, the mixed code for handling normal/partial IO is too mess,
> error-prone to modify IO handler functions with upcoming feature
> so this patch aims for cleaning up zram's I
For architecture(PAGE_SIZE > 4K), zram have supported partial IO.
However, the mixed code for handling normal/partial IO is too mess,
error-prone to modify IO handler functions with upcoming feature
so this patch aims for cleaning up zram's IO handling functions.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim
---
d
6 matches
Mail list logo