Re: [PATCH 2/6] seccomp: make underlying bpf ref counted as well

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > Additionally, we mark classic converted seccomp filters as seccomp eBPF > programs, since they are a subset of what is supported in seccomp eBPF. Off the top of my head, I'm okay with this. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[PATCH 2/6] seccomp: make underlying bpf ref counted as well

In the next patch, we're going to add a way to access the underlying filters via bpf fds. This means that we need to ref-count both the struct seccomp_filter objects and the struct bpf_prog objects separately, in case a process dies but a filter is still referred to by another process. Additionall