On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:57:36PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 05/10/12 12:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 25/09/12 18:53,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:57:36PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 05/10/12 12:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12
On 05/10/12 12:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
>>
>>> On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel
>
> Backend
On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the
On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the
On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel
On 05/10/12 12:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.12 at 13:42, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/10/12 11:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.09.12 at 19:53, David Vrabel wrote:
>> @@ -1167,7 +1168,8 @@ blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
>>
>> mutex_lock(>bd_mutex);
>>
>> -if (bdev->bd_openers) {
>> +/* If the backend is already CLOSED, close now. */
>> +if
>>> On 25.09.12 at 19:53, David Vrabel wrote:
> @@ -1167,7 +1168,8 @@ blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
>
> mutex_lock(>bd_mutex);
>
> - if (bdev->bd_openers) {
> + /* If the backend is already CLOSED, close now. */
> + if (bdev->bd_openers && backend_state !=
On 25.09.12 at 19:53, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
@@ -1167,7 +1168,8 @@ blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
mutex_lock(bdev-bd_mutex);
- if (bdev-bd_openers) {
+ /* If the backend is already CLOSED, close now. */
+ if (bdev-bd_openers
On 04/10/12 11:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.09.12 at 19:53, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com wrote:
@@ -1167,7 +1168,8 @@ blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
mutex_lock(bdev-bd_mutex);
-if (bdev-bd_openers) {
+/* If the backend is already CLOSED, close now. */
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> From: David Vrabel
> >>
> >> Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
> >> CLOSED. If a backend does transition to
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
CLOSED. If a backend does
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel
>>
>> Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
>> CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
>> frontend may not see the CLOSING state and
On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
frontend may not see the CLOSING
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel
>
> Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
> CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
> frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
>
> So, treat an
On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
From: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
From: David Vrabel
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
So, treat an unexpected backend CLOSED state the same as CLOSING.
From: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
CLOSED. If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
So, treat an unexpected backend CLOSED state
20 matches
Mail list logo