On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:24:40PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> I totally agreed. I only moved the original defintion around while cleaning
> up the header file. Right now there is no code using it. Should I remove it
> and access macros as soon there is a need for it ?
Sounds good.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:20:03 -0800
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +/* Address translation entry for mapped pci32 accesses */
> > +union bridge_ate {
> > + u64 ent;
> > + struct ate_s {
> > +
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +/* Address translation entry for mapped pci32 accesses */
> +union bridge_ate {
> + u64 ent;
> + struct ate_s {
> + u64 rmf:16;
> + u64 addr:36;
> +
Introduced bridge_read/bridge_write/bridge_set/bridge_clr for accessing
bridge register and get rid of volatile declarations. Also removed
all typedefs from arch/mips/include/asm/pci/bridge.h and cleaned up
language in arch/mips/pci/ops-bridge.c
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
