On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:55:06PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> if (...) BUG(); should be replaced with BUG_ON(...) when the test has no
> side-effects to allow a definition of BUG_ON that drops the code completely.
Hi, in the future, please separate ext
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
if (...) BUG(); should be replaced with BUG_ON(...) when the test has no
side-effects to allow a definition of BUG_ON that drops the code completely.
fs/ext2/balloc.c |3 +--
fs/ext2/dir.c|3 +--
fs/ext3/balloc.c |3 +--
fs/ext4/balloc.c |
2 matches
Mail list logo