Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>>
>> >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
>> >
>> > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
>> > confused,
>>
>> My understanding
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:48:48AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:35 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> > >
> > > >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:35 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> >
> > >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
> > >
> > > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
> >
> > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
> > confused,
>
> My understanding is that:
> 1) generate_random_uuid() u
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
> >
> > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
> > confused,
>
> My understanding is that:
> 1) generate_random_uuid() u
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
>
> So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally
> confused,
My understanding is that:
1) generate_random_uuid() use is allegedly bad even though it's in their
header,
2) poking directly at the byte a
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:47:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 07:33:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:12:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
...
> > Nothing,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:47:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 07:33:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:12:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > From: Andy Shevchenko
> > >
> > > It appears that uuid_t use in STM code abuses UUID
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 07:33:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:12:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko
> >
> > It appears that uuid_t use in STM code abuses UUID API.
>
> How is it being abused?
We are using it against the buffer that
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:12:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko
>
> It appears that uuid_t use in STM code abuses UUID API.
How is it being abused?
Moreover,
> this type is only useful when we parse user input. Due to above
> replace uuid_t with u8 uuid[16] and use u
From: Andy Shevchenko
It appears that uuid_t use in STM code abuses UUID API. Moreover,
this type is only useful when we parse user input. Due to above
replace uuid_t with u8 uuid[16] and use uuid_t only when parse
user input.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin
--
11 matches
Mail list logo