Hi Tejun,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > While shadow directories appear to be a good idea, the current scheme
> > of controlling their creation and destruction outside of sysfs appears
> > to be a locking and maintenance nightmare in the face of sysfs
> > directorie
Tejun Heo wrote:
> While shadow directories appear to be a good idea, the current scheme
> of controlling their creation and destruction outside of sysfs appears
> to be a locking and maintenance nightmare in the face of sysfs
> directories dynamically coming and going. Which can now occur for
> d
2 matches
Mail list logo
