On 21 September 2016 at 19:25, Dietmar Eggemann
wrote:
> On 21/09/16 13:34, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Hi Dietmar,
>>
>> On 21 September 2016 at 12:14, Dietmar Eggemann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Vincent,
>>>
>>> On 12/09/16 08:47, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I guess in the meantime we lost the f
On 21/09/16 13:34, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 12:14, Dietmar Eggemann
> wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> On 12/09/16 08:47, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>> I guess in the meantime we lost the functionality to remove a cfs_rq from the
>> leaf_cfs_rq list once the
Hi Dietmar,
On 21 September 2016 at 12:14, Dietmar Eggemann
wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 12/09/16 08:47, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Fix the insertion of cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list to ensure that
>> a child will always be called before its parent.
>>
>> The hierarchical order in shares update li
Hi Vincent,
On 12/09/16 08:47, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Fix the insertion of cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list to ensure that
> a child will always be called before its parent.
>
> The hierarchical order in shares update list has been introduced by
> commit 67e86250f8ea ("sched: Introduce hierarchal
Fix the insertion of cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list to ensure that
a child will always be called before its parent.
The hierarchical order in shares update list has been introduced by
commit 67e86250f8ea ("sched: Introduce hierarchal order on shares update list")
With the current implementation a
5 matches
Mail list logo