On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:35:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> A great deal of I2C devices are currently matched via DT node name, and
> as such the compatible naming convention of ',' has gone
> somewhat awry - some nodes don't supply one, some supply an arbitrary
> string and others the correct dev
A great deal of I2C devices are currently matched via DT node name, and
as such the compatible naming convention of ',' has gone
somewhat awry - some nodes don't supply one, some supply an arbitrary
string and others the correct device name with an arbitrary vendor prefix.
In an effort to correct
2 matches
Mail list logo
