Re: [PATCH 2/9] i2c: i2c-imx: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-09 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:35:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at > core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe > function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so

Re: [PATCH 2/9] i2c: i2c-imx: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-09 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:35:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the

[PATCH 2/9] i2c: i2c-imx: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in a deferred probe.

[PATCH 2/9] i2c: i2c-imx: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in a deferred probe.