On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:17:51PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> OK, then how's this for review? Compiles clean, can't test it myself
> for a few days.
>
> - int high = 0, mmu;
> - if (((unsigned long)virt_to_bus(memory) + size) > 0xUL)
> - high
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 04:17:51PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
OK, then how's this for review? Compiles clean, can't test it myself
for a few days.
- int high = 0, mmu;
- if (((unsigned long)virt_to_bus(memory) + size) 0xUL)
- high = 1;
-
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 08:26:45PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:23:44PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > For review and comment.
> >
> > On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
> > there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent()
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:23:44PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> For review and comment.
>
> On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
> there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
> back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:09:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > For review and comment.
> > >
> > > On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
> > >
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:09:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > For review and comment.
> >
> > On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
> > there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent()
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:09:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:16 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:09:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:23:44PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 08:26:45PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:23:44PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> For review and comment.
>
> On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
> there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
> back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
>
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with >4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
dma_mask could have supported using memory from other zones. Problems
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
dma_mask could have supported using memory from other zones. Problems
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:23 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
For review and comment.
On x86_64 systems with no IOMMU and with 4GB RAM (in fact, whenever
there are any pages mapped above 4GB), pci_alloc_consistent() falls
back to using ZONE_DMA for all allocations, even if the device's
dma_mask
14 matches
Mail list logo
