Hi Jean,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > My experience is not the same as yours, it seems... I cannot explain why,
> > unfortunately. (...)
>
> I can. [..]
> So as long as you don't move to a 2.6.11 kernel, don't even bother
> trying my patches, because you will never hit the code tha
Hi Ronald,
> I indeed don't test RC/MM kernels. I'm fairly happy with the current
> driver status, so I'm not doing any active new development on it. I run
> standard Fedora kernels with CVS of the driver (which is the same as
> what's in 2.6.10).
> (...)
> My experience is not the same as yours,
Hi Jean,
thanks for the reply.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I'm glad to learn you are testing things. Still the oops in saa7110 went
> unnoticed for the past 3 months, so I guess that either you don't have
> a DC10(+) in your test panel, or you did not test mm/rc kernels.
I indeed
Hi Ronald,
[Jean Delvare]
> It is possible that people are able to get their board to still work
> without my patch, if the chips were properly configured in the first
> place and they don't attempt to reconfigure them (like norm change). I
> don't know the chips well enough to tell how probable
Hi Jean,
I'm sorry for a late reply, mail is (still) misbehaving. I hope this
arrives at all...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jean Delvare wrote:
> It is possible that people are able to get their board to still work
> without my patch, if the chips were properly configured in the first
> place and they do
* Jean Delvare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > Are people reporting this as a problem?
>
> Not that I know. For adv7175 it couldn't be reported so far anyway
> because people would hit the oops in saa7110 before (same board: DC10+,
> oops fixed in a different patch).
Heh, right.
> It is poss
Hi Chris,
> > While working on the saa7110 driver I found a problem with the way
> > various video drivers (found on Zoran-based boards) prepare i2c
> > messages to be used by i2c_transfer. The drivers improperly copy the
> > i2c client flags as the message flags, while both sets are mostly
> > un
* Jean Delvare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While working on the saa7110 driver I found a problem with the way
> various video drivers (found on Zoran-based boards) prepare i2c messages
> to be used by i2c_transfer. The drivers improperly copy the i2c client
> flags as the message flag
Hi all,
While working on the saa7110 driver I found a problem with the way
various video drivers (found on Zoran-based boards) prepare i2c messages
to be used by i2c_transfer. The drivers improperly copy the i2c client
flags as the message flags, while both sets are mostly unrelated. The
net effec
9 matches
Mail list logo