Grant Coady wrote:
For:
linux-2.6.13-rc4:
118 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-files
475 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-items
7 pci_ids-duplicate-items
2321 pci_ids-list
725 pci_ids-not_used
linux-2.6.13-rc3-mm3:
119 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-files
475 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-items
7
Grant Coady wrote:
Does roughly 1/3 unused:
63065 2005-07-30 14:51 pci_ids-list
19243 2005-07-30 14:52 pci_ids-not_used
Seem in ballpark?
Yes.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Grant Coady wrote:
For:
linux-2.6.13-rc4:
118 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-files
475 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-items
7 pci_ids-duplicate-items
2321 pci_ids-list
725 pci_ids-not_used
linux-2.6.13-rc3-mm3:
119 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-files
475 pci_ids-defined_elsewhere-items
7
Grant Coady wrote:
Does roughly 1/3 unused:
63065 2005-07-30 14:51 pci_ids-list
19243 2005-07-30 14:52 pci_ids-not_used
Seem in ballpark?
Yes.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:21:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
>through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
> If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
>that
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:21:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
that info
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:52:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>However you did your search, you did it wrong. The very first two
>entries I tried had zero uses:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]$ grepsrc ICH7_22
>./include/linux/pci_ids.h:#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_22 0x27e0
Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:21:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
Only these seem not referenced by source:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:21:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
>through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
Only these seem not referenced by source:
PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PCI_HOTPLUG
Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
that info in pci.ids.
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
> through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
> If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
> that info in pci.ids.
It looks like
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
This define is not actually used anywhere that I know of. I just wanted
to be consistent and correct, following what was previously done. I
have been wondering if I should be adding devices to the pci_ids.h file
that are not being currently used. It seems like most
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc4 1/1] pci_ids: patch for Intel ICH7R
>
>Jason Gaston wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file.
>This
Jason Gaston wrote:
Hello,
This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file. This patch was built against the 2.6.13-rc4 kernel.
If acceptable, please apply.
Thanks,
Jason Gaston
Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hello,
This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file. This
patch was built against the 2.6.13-rc4 kernel.
If acceptable, please apply.
Thanks,
Jason Gaston
Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig
Hello,
This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file. This
patch was built against the 2.6.13-rc4 kernel.
If acceptable, please apply.
Thanks,
Jason Gaston
Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig
Jason Gaston wrote:
Hello,
This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file. This patch was built against the 2.6.13-rc4 kernel.
If acceptable, please apply.
Thanks,
Jason Gaston
Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc4 1/1] pci_ids: patch for Intel ICH7R
Jason Gaston wrote:
Hello,
This patch adds the Intel ICH7R SATA RAID DID to the pci_ids.h file.
This patch was built against the 2.6.13-rc4 kernel.
If acceptable, please
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
This define is not actually used anywhere that I know of. I just wanted
to be consistent and correct, following what was previously done. I
have been wondering if I should be adding devices to the pci_ids.h file
that are not being currently used. It seems like most
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
that info in pci.ids.
It looks like Greg
Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
If constants are not being used, it's IMHO more appropriate to store
that info in pci.ids.
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:21:05 -0400, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[speaking to the audience] I wouldn't mind if someone did a pass
through pci_ids.h and removed all the constants that are not being used.
Only these seem not referenced by source:
PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PCI_HOTPLUG
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:52:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However you did your search, you did it wrong. The very first two
entries I tried had zero uses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]$ grepsrc ICH7_22
./include/linux/pci_ids.h:#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_22 0x27e0
[EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo