On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> actually, we have a big multiplexer there already, so it's only
> symmetric. Nothing is served by doing it half-assed. I raised the issue
> of the multiplexer back when the first futex API was merged (years ago),
> and it was rejecte
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:45:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> include/asm-i386/futex.h:
>
> switch (cmp) {
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
> case FUTEX
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:04:53AM +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall
> > provided in -rt patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the
> > use of 64bit futex.
>
> Big
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:04:53AM +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall provided in
> -rt
> patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the use of 64bit futex.
Big NACK here, we don't need yet another goddamn multiplexer. Please
Hi,
This latest patch is an adaptation of the sys_futex64 syscall provided in -rt
patch (originally written by Ingo). It allows the use of 64bit futex.
I have re-worked most of the code to avoid the duplication of the code.
It does not provide the functionality for all architectures, and thus,
5 matches
Mail list logo
