Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq

> > +#include > This can just be , because you're only using > wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? > I fixed this up before merging. Yes, right. Thanks for your help! Regards Nam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq

Looks OK to me, queued for 2.6.21, except: > +#include This can just be , because you're only using wait_queue_head_t and not struct completion, right? I fixed this up before merging. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL P

[PATCH 2.6.21-rc2] ehca: fix mismatched sync between completion handler and destroy cq

This patch fixes two issues reported by Roland and Christoph H.: - Mismatched sync/locking between completion handler and destroy cq We introduced a counter nr_events per cq to track number of irq events seen. This counter is incremented when an event queue entry is seen and decremented after