Hello.
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Now that the -rt patch has been first release in the broken-out version,
let me tell you that the following 3 patches in the series can be just
annihilated:
preempt-irqs-ppc-ack-irq-fixups.patch
preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-b5.patch
preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-more-fasteoi
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 20:47 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Now that the -rt patch has been first release in the broken-out version,
> let me tell you that the following 3 patches in the series can be just
> annihilated:
>
> preempt-irqs-ppc-ack-irq-fixups.patch
> preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-b5.pat
Hello, I wrote:
Revert the change to the "fasteoi" type chips as after handle_fasteoi_irq() had
been fixed, they've become meaningless (and even dangerous -- as was the case
with Celleb that has been fixed earlier)...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The patch in ques
Revert the change to the "fasteoi" type chips as after handle_fasteoi_irq() had
been fixed, they've become meaningless (and even dangerous -- as was the case
with Celleb that has been fixed earlier)...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The patch in question wasn't even initia
4 matches
Mail list logo
