o This patch moves the code to verify long mode and SSE to a common file.
This code is now shared by trampoline.S, wakeup.S, boot/setup.S and
boot/compressed/head.S
o So far we used to do very limited check in trampoline.S, wakeup.S and
in 32bit entry point. Now all the entry paths are for
Hi!
> > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > >
> > > > Normally it's not ok to take sole copyright on code that you mostly
> > > > copied ...
> > >
> > > Is this a case where the original had no copyright notice? If so,
> > > what do you suggest Vivek should
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:55, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Andi Kleen writes:
> >
> > > On Friday 17 November 2006 23:59, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > >
> > > > + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > >
> > > No
On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:55, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andi Kleen writes:
>
> > On Friday 17 November 2006 23:59, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
> > Normally it's not ok to take sole copyright on code that you mostly copie
Andi Kleen writes:
> On Friday 17 November 2006 23:59, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> > + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Normally it's not ok to take sole copyright on code that you mostly copied ...
Is this a case where the original had no copyright notice? If so,
what
On Friday 17 November 2006 23:59, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> + * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Vivek Goyal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Normally it's not ok to take sole copyright on code that you mostly copied ...
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
Andi Kleen wrote:
Finding panic=.. would require writing a command line parser in 16bit assembly.
I have my doubts that's a good use of anyone's time.
There already is one, in the EDD code.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
> However, this test should probably be pushed earlier, into setup.S,
> where executing a BIOS-clean reboot is much easier.
It's already in there in fact. It wasn't originally, until we discovered
that there is no way to output a message in head.S when you're
using vesafb. The only way to give
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:32:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:59:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>Oleg Verych wrote:
> >>>It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and
> >>>Intel's amd64 destop PC require that). In ca
Oleg Verych wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:59:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Oleg Verych wrote:
It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and
Intel's amd64 destop PC require that). In case of reboot timeout (or
just reboot with jump to BIOS), i will just choose ano
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:59:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> >It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and
> >Intel's amd64 destop PC require that). In case of reboot timeout (or
> >just reboot with jump to BIOS), i will just choose another ima
Oleg Verych wrote:
It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and
Intel's amd64 destop PC require that). In case of reboot timeout (or
just reboot with jump to BIOS), i will just choose another image to boot
or will press F8 to have another boot device.
That's a fairly
Andi Kleen wrote:
May hang be done optional? There was a discussion about applying
"panic" reboot timeout here. Is it possible to implement somehow?
It would be tricky, but might be possible. But that would be a completely
new feature -- the kernel has always hung in this case. If you think yo
> May hang be done optional? There was a discussion about applying
> "panic" reboot timeout here. Is it possible to implement somehow?
It would be tricky, but might be possible. But that would be a completely
new feature -- the kernel has always hung in this case. If you think you need
it submit
Hallo.
On 2006-11-17, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[]
> +no_longmode:
> + /* This isn't an x86-64 CPU so hang */
> +1:
> + hlt
> + jmp 1b
> +
> +#include "../../kernel/verify_cpu.S"
> +
May hang be done optional? There was a discussion about applying
"panic" reboot timeout here. Is it possi
o This patch moves the code to verify long mode and SSE to a common file.
This code is not shared by trampoline.S, wakeup.S, boot/setup.S and
boot/compressed/head.S
o So far we used to do very limited check in trampoline.S, wakeup.S and
in 32bit entry point. Now all the entry paths are for
16 matches
Mail list logo