On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:51:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Mostly to keep it symmetric with the sockopt. I could probably remove
> > a few arguments in the series if we want to be strict.
>
> My preference would use strict and add
> arguments only when necessary.
In a few cases that would
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 12:30 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 08:26 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space
> > > without going through a fake
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:00:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 08:26 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space
> > without going through a fake uaccess.
>
> This seems used only with true as the second arg.
> Is
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 08:26 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space
> without going through a fake uaccess.
This seems used only with true as the second arg.
Is there reason to have that argument at all?
> diff --git
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space
> without going through a fake uaccess.
It looks like if this is an AF_INET6 socket, it will just pass the message
straight through to AF_INET4, so:
Reviewed-by: David Howells
Add a helper to directly set the IP_RECVERR sockopt from kernel space
without going through a fake uaccess.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/net/ip.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 10 ++
net/rxrpc/local_object.c | 8 +---
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+),
6 matches
Mail list logo
