Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-22 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/21/2016 04:16 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the

Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-22 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/21/2016 04:16 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-21 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-21 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-17 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup > >decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is > >node-based, it is only required to

Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-17 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup > >decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is > >node-based, it is only required to

Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the

Re: [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/09/2016 08:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-09 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-06-09 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-04-15 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-04-15 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-04-06 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be

[PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone

2016-04-06 Thread Mel Gorman
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone. Note that one node might be