On Tuesday 25 September 2012 02:47:28 Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2012.09.24 at 19:58 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> > >
> > > - FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLA
On 2012.09.24 at 19:58 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
> >
> > - FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -lbfd
> > + FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS)
On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
>
> - FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -lbfd
> + FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS)
> -DPACKAGE='perf' -
in this cas
From: Markus Trippelsdorf
With recent binutils I get:
perf % make
Makefile:668: No bfd.h/libbfd found, install binutils-dev[el]/zlib-static to
gain symbol demanglin
That happens because bfd.h now contains:
I've reopened a bug in the hope that this check will be deleted:
http://sourceware.org
4 matches
Mail list logo