On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:27 +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
> > We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to
> > meet
> > kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
> >
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:27 +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
> We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
> kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine
>
> ---
> Tested by compilation without errors.
>
> d
We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
3 matches
Mail list logo