Re: [PATCH 29/34] clk: si570: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs

2016-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/01, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Guenter Roeck

Re: [PATCH 29/34] clk: si570: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs

2016-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/01, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Guenter Roeck > Cc: Sören

[PATCH 29/34] clk: si570: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs

2016-06-01 Thread Stephen Boyd
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. Cc: Guenter Roeck Cc: Sören Brinkmann

[PATCH 29/34] clk: si570: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs

2016-06-01 Thread Stephen Boyd
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. Cc: Guenter Roeck Cc: Sören Brinkmann Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd --- See